Sourcing & negotiation

Category management in procurement: the Kraljic matrix and a category plan

Sourcing & negotiation · · Published 2026-10-13

Rows of ornate brass post office boxes, each with a small window and a number from 544 to 624
Numbered brass post office boxes. Category management starts by sorting spend into groups that can each have a strategy.

Category management organises procurement around groups of related goods and services (categories) rather than around individual purchase requests. Each category gets an owner, a strategy based on its market and its importance to the business, and a multi-year plan. It is the main way large procurement functions move from processing orders to shaping what the organisation buys and from whom.

What counts as a category

A category is a group of purchases that share a supply market: suppliers that compete with each other, similar cost drivers and similar buying skills. "Logistics" is usually too broad to manage as one category; "road freight", "ocean freight" and "warehousing" are more workable because each has its own suppliers and pricing logic. The spend analysis taxonomy is the natural starting point, adjusted so that each category corresponds to a real market.

The category management cycle

  1. Analyse. Gather internal data (spend, volumes, specifications, contracts, users' needs and complaints) and external data (market structure, main suppliers, capacity, cost drivers, regulation, technology trends). Tools such as Porter's five forces or a simple cost breakdown of the product help explain where supplier power and price pressure come from.
  2. Position. Decide how important the category is to the business and how difficult the supply market is. The Kraljic matrix (below) is the classic tool.
  3. Set the strategy. Choose levers that fit the position: competition, consolidation, demand management, specification change, partnership, risk mitigation.
  4. Implement. Run the sourcing events, negotiations and changes the strategy calls for (see RFI, RFP and RFQ and negotiation basics).
  5. Manage and review. Track supplier performance, savings and risks, and refresh the strategy typically every one to three years or when the market shifts.

The Kraljic matrix

In a 1983 Harvard Business Review article, "Purchasing Must Become Supply Management", Peter Kraljic proposed classifying purchases along two dimensions: their profit impact (or importance to the business, often approximated by spend and effect on product quality or revenue) and supply risk (the difficulty and risk of securing supply, reflecting the number of suppliers, substitutes, scarcity and switching costs). The result is four quadrants.

QuadrantProfit impact / supply riskTypical examplesTypical strategy
Non-critical (routine)Low / lowOffice supplies, standard MRO itemsSimplify and automate: catalogues, purchasing cards, aggregated contracts, minimal buyer time.
LeverageHigh / lowCommodity materials, standard packaging, many indirect servicesUse buying power: competitive tenders, volume consolidation, e-auctions, index-linked pricing.
BottleneckLow / highA specialised component from one approved source, niche spare partsSecure supply: safety stock, long-term agreements, qualifying alternatives, redesigning to standard parts.
StrategicHigh / highKey technologies, critical raw materials, core outsourced servicesPartner and plan: long-term relationships, joint development, shared forecasts, careful risk management.

The matrix is valuable because it stops a team from applying one approach to everything. Running an aggressive e-auction on a bottleneck item can damage the only supplier you have; spending weeks negotiating stationery is wasted effort. Its limits are equally important: positions are judgements, not measurements; the matrix looks at categories from the buyer's side only; and items move between quadrants as markets change. A useful complement is to consider how the supplier sees you: whether your account is attractive and significant to them affects how much leverage or partnership is realistic.

Writing a category strategy

A category strategy is a short document, often a few pages, that stakeholders can read and agree. A practical outline:

Levers beyond price

Price negotiation is only one lever, and often not the largest. Others include:

Stakeholders make or break it

Category management fails most often not on analysis but on adoption. Users who were not consulted keep buying from their preferred suppliers. Good practice is to form a small cross-functional team per major category, with representatives from the main using functions, finance and, for technical categories, engineering or IT; to agree requirements with them before going to market; and to report results in terms they care about (service, risk, budget) as well as savings.